Skip to main content

Pricing

Documentation migration pricing

Every voix engagement is a one-time project fee. A documentation migration is quoted after a scope review; there is no subscription, no per-seat charge and no platform licence to renew. Once your documentation is in your own Git repository, keeping it there costs nothing.

Model

One-time fee per project. No subscription and no per-seat cost.

Payment

50% at signing, 50% on delivery, both set in a written proposal.

Standard delivery

Two business weeks from the deposit and the materials the work needs.

Three price points

What it costs#what-it-costs

There are three things you can buy. One of them is the migration itself; the other two are optional and sit on top of it.

Core project

Docs migration project

Custom quote

A one-time fee, scoped by documentation volume, complexity and implementation requirements. It covers the whole engagement — audit, architecture, implementation, training and handoff — and ends with your team publishing without voix in the loop.

Optional add-on

5 interventions package

Small extra cost

Five post-launch maintenance interventions for fixes and minor updates, bought on top of the migration. Worth taking if your team wants a safety net while it takes over authoring.

Additional service

Portfolio creation

500 EUR

A one-time build, available on request and scoped separately from a migration. It is the one price on this page that does not need a scope review first.

One-time means one-time. voix does not sell a subscription, a per-seat licence or a hosting plan, and nothing here renews. What you end up with is an open-source stack running on infrastructure you control, so the cost of keeping the documentation online after handoff is whatever your own hosting already costs. Whatever is agreed goes into a written proposal before work starts.

Scoping

What drives the quote#what-drives-the-quote

Two documentation sets with the same page count can be weeks apart in effort. These are the variables that move the number, and the ones you will be asked about first.

Page count
How many pages actually move. Most documentation sets carry pages nobody has opened in a year, and the audit separates what migrates from what gets archived. The archived pile is the cheap part.
Source systems
One export from one platform is a straight run. Content split across a help centre, an internal wiki, a shared drive and a handful of README files means several extraction paths, several formats, and one merge that has to reconcile them.
Rewrite vs convert
Converting clean, structured content is mechanical work. Pages written in a WYSIWYG editor, with styling baked into the markup and no consistent heading levels, have to be rewritten rather than converted, and rewriting is priced as writing.
Redirects
If the current URLs are public and indexed, every one of them needs a mapped redirect and a link check before launch. If the docs are internal, or the domain is changing anyway, that work disappears from the quote.
Authors to train
Training two engineers who already work in Git is a short session. Onboarding a mixed group of writers, support leads and product managers who have never opened a pull request takes structured sessions and written guides they can use after handoff.
Versioning
Publishing a single current version is simpler than maintaining several released versions side by side, each with its own navigation, its own redirects and its own release workflow.

None of these is padding. Each one maps to hours inside a phase you can see in advance: the engagement process lists the phases in order and says who does what in each of them. If your setup has an awkward edge — a docs site that is half marketing pages, a translation workflow, an API reference generated from source — the FAQ covers the ones that come up most.

Delivery scope

What the fee covers#what-the-fee-covers

The migration fee buys a finished engagement, not a content dump into a new repository. Scope is confirmed per project in the proposal, and these are the standard building blocks.

01

Audit and architecture

  • Content audit and migration map
  • Information architecture redesign
  • Search and navigation optimisation
02

Platform and pipeline

  • Docusaurus implementation
  • Versioning and release workflow
  • CI/CD publishing setup
03

Standards and people

  • Authoring standards and templates
  • Contributor onboarding and training
  • Governance and ownership model
04

Launch and handoff

  • QA, redirects and link checks
  • Launch support and handoff playbook
  • Post-launch iteration plan

Each block is described in depth on the services page, including what voix does not take on. Anything not written into the proposal is out of scope until it is approved in writing, which is what keeps the one-time fee a one-time fee.

Commercial terms

Payment and terms#payment-and-terms

Every engagement runs under a written proposal or statement of work that fixes scope, timeline and fees before anyone starts. This is the short version of what that document says about money.

Deposit
50% of the agreed fee at contract signing. Work begins once it has been received.
Balance
The remaining 50% is due on delivery.
Delivery
Standard delivery is within two business weeks of the deposit and the materials the project depends on. Late materials move the date.
Scope changes
Anything outside the agreed proposal needs written approval before it is built, so the fee never moves quietly.
Bugs
Defects voix introduces are fixed at no charge. Defects caused by changes made on your side are quoted case by case and capped at 500 EUR.
Ownership
On full payment you own the final deliverables. voix keeps the rights to its own pre-existing tools, templates and know-how.

This is a summary, not the agreement, and it adds nothing to it. Late payment, the limits on liability, and the governing law of the Republic of Moldova are all set out in full in the terms and conditions. How your material is handled while the work runs — who can see it, how long a copy is kept, what happens when you ask for it back — is covered separately in the confidentiality policy.

Straight answer

How much does a documentation migration cost?#how-much-does-a-documentation-migration-cost

A documentation migration from voix is a single one-time project fee, quoted after a scope review rather than published as a list price, because the cost is driven by how much of your content has to be rewritten rather than converted and that cannot be read off a page count.

A single published price would be wrong in both directions: too high for a small product manual that exports cleanly, far too low for a platform reference spread across three systems where half the pages need rewriting before they can move. Quoting per project keeps the fee tied to the work rather than to a tier someone picked off a page.

What comes back is a written proposal with scope, timeline and fee — the same document the engagement then runs under. Nothing starts before it is signed and the deposit is received, and the fee does not move afterwards unless you approve a change in writing.

If you would rather see the shape of the work before asking for a number, the services page describes what is delivered and the FAQ answers the questions that usually come before a first email.

Send this

What to send to get a number back

  • A link to your current documentation, or an export if it sits behind a login
  • A rough page count, even an order of magnitude
  • Every system the content lives in today, including wikis and shared drives
  • Whether the current URLs are public and have to keep working
  • Whether more than one version has to be published at a time
  • Who will be writing documentation after handoff, and how many of them
  • Any date the migration has to land before

Send your docs, get a scope and a fee

Describe what you have and where it lives today. You get back a written proposal with scope, timeline and a one-time price.